中华创伤杂志
         2025年4月10日 星期四           首 页          期刊简介          编委会          投稿指南          期刊订阅          留言板          联系我们          学术影响
 
中华创伤杂志
骨与关节损伤 最新目录| 下期目录| 过刊浏览| 高级检索 |
锁骨钩钢板联合喙锁韧带重建与单纯钩钢板治疗急性肩锁关节脱位的疗效比较 
殷建,殷照阳,王华,朱超,王斌,张翔,王超,刘新晖
南京医科大学附属江宁医院骨科 211100; 徐州医科大学附属连云港市第一人民医院骨科 222000
Efficacy comparison between clavicular hook plate combined with coracoclavicular figment reconstruction and simple hook plate for acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation
Yin Jian,Yin Zhaoyang,Wang Hua,Zhu Chao,Wang Bin,Zhang Xiang,Wang Chao,Liu Xinhui

全文: PDF (1405 KB)   HTML (0 KB) 
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 

目的 观察对比锁骨钩钢板联合腱翻转功能性重建喙锁韧带与单纯锁骨钩钢板治疗Rockwood Ⅲ、Ⅴ型急性肩锁关节脱位的疗效.方法 采用前瞻性队列研究分析2011年10月-2016年4月南京医科大学附属江宁医院收治的37例RockwoodⅢ、Ⅴ型急性肩锁关节脱位患者的临床资料.根据随机数字法将患者分为联合腱韧带重建组(韧带重建组,19例)和单纯锁骨钩钢板治疗组(单纯钢板组,18例).韧带重建组男14例,女5例;年龄(47.0±11.4)岁;Ⅲ型10例,Ⅴ型9例.单纯钢板组男12例,女6例;年龄(45.0±11.2)岁;Ⅲ型11例,Ⅴ型7例.韧带重建组通过锁骨钩钢板复位肩锁关节,采用联合腱肱二头肌短头腱外侧半反转重建斜方韧带和喙肱肌腱外侧半翻转重建锥状韧带,对喙锁韧带行功能性双束重建.单纯钢板组仅使用钩钢板复位肩锁关节.比较两组术中手术切口长度、手术时间、出血量及术前、术后1年视觉模拟评分(VAS).术后1年应用Constant-Murley评分和Karlsson评分评估手术疗效.定期随访拍摄X线片观察肩锁关节脱位的复位及维持情况.同时记录并发症发生情况.结果 37例患者均获随访17 ~24个月[(20.0±1.7)个月].两组术中出血量差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).韧带重建组和单纯钢板组手术切口长度分别为(13.4±0.8)cm和(6.6±0.7) cm(P< 0.05);手术时间分别为(88.7±8.3) min和(54.1 ±7.3) min(P <0.05).韧带重建组和单纯钢板组术前VAS分别为(7.5±0.9)分和(7.3±0.7)分(P>0.05),而术后1年VAS分别为(2.1±0.9)分和(3.8±1.4)分(P<0.05).X线片示韧带重建组肩锁关节得到良好复位,钩钢板取出后未出现复位丢失.单纯钢板组在钩钢板取出后出现复位丢失、锁骨远端骨吸收及骨性融合等.韧带重建组和单纯钢板组Constant-Murley评分分别为(89.5±2.9)分和(79.6±5.0)分;Karlsson评分优良率分别为90%(17/19)和61% (11/18)(P均<0.05).韧带重建组1例诉取腱处疼痛、肿胀.单纯钢板组3例内固定取出后复位丢失,7例在术后1年出现明显的肩峰下骨溶解,9例术后1年出现肩峰撞击征阳性.结论 锁骨钩钢板联合腱翻转功能性重建喙锁韧带治疗RockwoodⅢ、Ⅴ型急性肩锁关节脱位的手术切口长度和手术时间较单纯使用锁骨钩钢板长,但整体手术疗效优于单纯锁骨钩钢板.

服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
殷建
殷照阳
王华
朱超
王斌
张翔
王超
刘新晖
关键词 肩锁关节脱位喙锁韧带    
Abstract

Objective To compare the efficacy between hook plate combined with coracoclavicular ligament functional reconstruction by conjoined tendon transfer and single hook plate surgery in the treatment of Rockwood type Ⅲ and type Ⅴ acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations.Methods A prospective cohort study was conducted to analyze the clinical data of 37 patients with Rockwood type Ⅲ and Ⅴ acute acromioclavicular dislocations admitted to Jiangning Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University from October 2011 to April 2016.According to the random number method,the patients were divided into combined tendon and ligament reconstruction group (ligament reconstruction group,19 patients) and clavicular hook plate group (single plate group,18 patients).In the ligament reconstruction group,there were 14 males and five females,aged (47.0 ± 11.4) years,and there were 10 patients with type Ⅲ and nine with type Ⅴ.In the simple plate group,there were 12 males and six females,aged (45.0 ± 11.2)years,and there were 11 patients with type Ⅲ and seven with type Ⅴ.In the ligament reconstruction group,the acromioclavicular joint was reduced by clavicular hook plate,and the oblique ligament and the conical ligament were reconstructed by lateral half-inversion of the short head tendon of biceps brachii combined with tendon.The double-bundle functional reconstruction of coracoclavicular ligament was performed.In single plate group,hook plate was used to reduce acromioclavicular joint.The intraoperative blood loss,incision length,operation time,and visual analogue score (VAS) before operation and after 1 year follow-up were compared.Constant-Murley score and Karlsson score were used to evaluate the effect of operation.X-ray films were taken regularly to observe the reduction and maintenance of acromioclavicular joint dislocation.The complications were recorded.Results All patients were followed up for 17-24 months [(20.0 ± 1.7) months].There was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss between the two groups (P > 0.05).In the ligament reconstruction group and single plate group,the incision length was (13.4 ± 0.8) cm and (6.6 ± 0.7) cm (P < 0.05);the operation time was (88.7 ± 8.3) minutes and (54.1 ± 7.3) minutes (P < 0.05);the preoperative VAS score was (7.5 ± 0.9) points and (7.3 ± 0.7) points (P > 0.05);the VAS at 1 year after operation was (2.1 ± 0.9) points and (3.8 ± 1.4) points (P < 0.05).X-ray showed good reduction of acromioclavicular joint in ligament reconstruction group,with no loss of reduction occurred after removal of hook plate.In the simple plate group,loss of reduction,resorption of distal clavicle bone and bone fusion occurred after removal of hook plate.The Constant-Murley scores in the ligament reconstruction group and the single plate group were (89.5 ± 2.9) points and (79.6 ± 5.0) points respectively;the excellent and good rates of Karlsson score were 89.5% (17/19) and 61.1% (11/18) (both P < 0.05),respectively.In the ligament reconstruction group,one patient complained of pain and swelling at the tendon.In the single plate group,loss of reduction occurred in three patients after removal of internal fixator;obvious subacromial osteolysis was seen in seven patients at 1 year after operation;and impingement sign was positive in nine patients at 1 year after operation.Conclusion The overall surgical effect of hook plate combined with coracoclavicular ligament functional reconstruction by conjoined tendon transfer is superior to single hook plate surgery in the treatment of type Rockwood Ⅲ and Rockwood Ⅴ acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations,though with longer operation time and bigger incision.

Key wordsAcromioclavicular joint    Dislocations    Coracoclavicular ligament   
     出版日期: 2019-08-30
基金资助:

南京医科大学科技发展基金(2016NJMU156)

通讯作者: 刘新晖,Email:professodxh2008@163.com,电话:18795952898   
引用本文:   
殷建,殷照阳,王华,朱超,王斌,张翔,王超,刘新晖. 锁骨钩钢板联合喙锁韧带重建与单纯钩钢板治疗急性肩锁关节脱位的疗效比较 [J]. 中华创伤杂志, 2019, 35(2): 143-149. Yin Jian,Yin Zhaoyang,Wang Hua,Zhu Chao,Wang Bin,Zhang Xiang,Wang Chao,Liu Xinhui. Efficacy comparison between clavicular hook plate combined with coracoclavicular figment reconstruction and simple hook plate for acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation. CHINESE JOURNAL OF TRAUMA, 2019, 35(2): 143-149.
链接本文:  
http://manu24.magtech.com.cn/jweb_zgcszz/CN/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-8050.2019.02.008     或     http://manu24.magtech.com.cn/jweb_zgcszz/CN/Y2019/V35/I2/143
京ICP备07035254号-18
版权所 ©
电话:023-68818654
技术支持:北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn