Abstract：Objective To investigate the stress characteristics of atlanto-axial bony structure under conditions of anteflexion,posterior extension,lateral flexion,and rotation after artificial atlanto-odontoid joint arthroplasty using three-dimensional finite element method and to improve the orientation of artificial atlantoodontoid joint from perspective of stress.Methods A three-dimensional finite element model of prosthetic atlanto-odontoid joint arthroplasty was created from CT images of the artificial atlantoodontoid joint and cervical vertebrae using software Mimics,Freeform,and Ansys.Stress characteristics of the model dealt with proneness,posterior extension,lateral flexion,or rotation loads were observed.Biomechanical performance of the bony structure of the model was analyzed and the orientation in improving the prosthesis was discussed.Results Anteflexion loading produced a maximum stress of 0.138 ×l08 N/m2 at the junction of lateral mass and posterior arch of the atlas,and 0.201 × 108 N/m2 at axial nail hole,contact point of plates with the axis,and posterior arch of the axis.Posterior extension loading produced a maximum stress of 0.666 × 107 N/m2 at junction of lateral mass and posterior arch of the atlas and 0.254 × 108 N/m2 at arch of the axis.Besides,stress concentration occurred at atlantoaxis nail hole.Right bending produced a maximum stress of 0.124 × 108 N/m2 at nail hole of right mass of atlas and 0.178 × 108 N/m2 at right contact point of the axis with plates.Right rotation produced a maximum stress of 0.847 × 107 N/m2 at junction of lateral mass and posterior arch of the atlas and 0.170 × 109 N/m2 at contact point of the axis with plates.The finite element model comprised 28 620 nodes and 107 441 units and provided good defining of the structural properties of artificial atlanto-odontoid joint arthroplasty.Under different loading conditions,the stress was mainly distributed in contact point of the vertebral body with plates,nail holes,junction of lateral mass and posterior arch of the atlas,and axial pedicle.Conclusions Prosthetic atlanto-odontoid joint scatters a part of the stress and alters the stress distribution of the atlas and axis from the intact condition.Finite element method can obtain complete analysis of the stress distribution of the artificial atlanto-odontoid joint arthroplasty.
. Finite element analysis of biomechanical performance of atlantoaxial bony structure following artificial atlanto-odontoid joint arthroplasty[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF TRAUMA, 2013, 29(12): 1204-1209.
［4］Hu Y, Yang SH, Xie H, et al. Quantitative anatomic study of atlanto-odontoid joint and design of an artificial atlanto-odontoidjoint for the orthopedic clinic. Chin J Traumatol, 2007, 10(3):138-144.
［5］Lu B, He XJ, Zhao CG, et al. Artificial atlanto-odontoid joint replacement through a transoral approach. Eur Spine J, 2009, 18(1):109-117.
［6］Hu Y, Gu YJ, He XF, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of stability and three-dimensional movements of the atlantoaxial joint after artificial atlanto-odontoid joint arthroplasty. Orthop Surg, 2010, 2(2):111-118.
［7］Imajo Y,Hiiragi I,Kato Y,et al.Use of the finite element method to study the mechanism of spinal cord injury without radiological abnormality in the cervical spine.Spine,2009,34(2):E83-E87.
［8］Dickinson AS, Taylor AC, Ozturk H, et al. Eexperimental validation of a finite element model of the proximal femur using digital image correlation and a composite bone model.J Biomech Eng, 2011, 133(1):014504.
［9］Hussain M,Natarajan RN,Chaudhary G,et al.Simulation of inhomogeneous rather than homogeneous poroelastic tissue material properties within disc annulus and nucleus better predicts cervical spine response: a C3-T1 finite etement analysis under compression and moment loadings. Spine, 2011, 36(4):E245-E255.
［11］Bozkus H, Karakas A, Hanci M, et al. Finite element model of the Jefferson fracture: comparison with a cadaver model. Eur Spine J, 2001, 10(3):257-263.
［15］King CM, Cobb M,Collman DR,et al.Bicortical fixation of medial malleolar fractures: a review of 23 cases at risk for complicated bone healing. J Foot Ankle Surg, 2012, 51(1):39-44.
［17］Vasconcellos LM,Leite DO,Oliveira FN, et al.Evaluation of bone ingrowth into porous titanium implant: histomorphometric analysis in rabbits. Braz Oral Res, 2010, 24(4):399-405.
