Abstract：Objective To validate the safety and accuracy of a rapid prototyping drill template (RPDT) for posterior atlantoaxial transarticular screw placement and analyze factors for screw deviation.Methods Twelve normal cadaveric cervical spines were examined using 64 slice CT with 1-mm thick scan and data in Dicom format were recorded.After data was processed using software Mimics 10.01 for three-dimensional (3-D) model reconstruction,computer-assisted design of optimum trajactory for atlantoaxial transarticular screw placement was worked out and made into a drill template,where the surface was created as the inverse of axial posterior surface.The drill template was materialized in a rapid prototyping machine and used to place the screws.After surgery,the position of posterior atlantoaxial transarticular screw was evaluated by X-ray and CT scan.Screw entry point,angle and orientation of the optimal and actual trajactory were determined after fitting the position of the pre-operative and post-operative specimen in computer software and the redefining the 3-D coordinate axis.Results Twenty-four screws were implanted with no cortex perforation.Depth of the optimum save screw trajectory for atlantoaxial transarticular fixation was (37.34 ± 2.31) mm on the left side and (37.11 ± 2.21) mm on the right side.Introversion angles of the optimum save screw trajectory was 0° in both sides,but the actual angle was (0.15 ±0.58)°on the left side and (0.11 ±0.46)°on the right side.Elevation angle of the optimum save screw trajectory was (49.35 ± 1.62) °on the left side and (48.83 ± 1.83) ° on the right side,but the actual angle was (49.29 ± 1.68) °and (49.10 ± 1.45) °respectively.Average displacement of screw entry point in the x,y and z axis was respective (0.21 ±0.65) mm,(0.69 ± 1.48) mm and (0.39 ±0.11) mm on the right side,while (0.19 ± 0.66) mm,(0.53 ± 1.45) mm and (0.38 ± 0.13) mm on the left side.There were no statistically significant differences in deviation levels of entry point and orientation between the optimum and actual screw trajectory (P ＞ 0.05).Conclusions Causes for deviation in RPDT-assisted placement of atlantoaxial transarticular screw are mainly intrinsic factors of the hardware and software and human factors in the operation.RPDT is easy in operation and has individualized design,which greatly improves the accuracy of screw placement and reduces screw deviation.RPDT can be widely used in clinical practice.
［1］Lee SH, Kim ES, Sung JK, et al. Clinical and radiological comparison of treatment of atlantoaxial instability by posterior C1-C2 transarticular screw fixation or C1 lateral mass-C2 pedicle screw fixation. J Clin Neurosci, 2010, 17(7)：886-892.
［2］Bahadur R, Goyal T, Dhatt SS, et al. Transarticular screw fixation for atlantoaxial instability-modified Magerl's technique in 38 patients. J Orthop Surg Res, 2010, 5：87.
［3］Nagaria J, Kelleher MO, McEvoy L, et al. C1-C2 transarticular screw fixation for atlantoaxial instability due to rheumatoid arthritis: a seven-year analysis of outcome. Spine, 2009, 34(26)：2880-2885.
［4］Magerl F,Seemann PS.Stable posterior fusion of the atlas and axis by transarticular screw fixation∥Kehr P, Weidner A, eds. Cervical Spine. 1st ed. New York: Springer, 1987：322-327.
［5］Guo X, Ni B, Zhao W, et al. Biomechanical assessment of bilateral C1 laminar hook and C1-2 transarticular screws and bone graft for atlantoaxial instability. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2009, 22(8)：578-585.
［6］Finn MA, Apfelbaum RI. Atlantoaxial transarticular screw fixation: update on technique and outcomes in 269 patients. Neurosurgery, 2010, 66(3 Suppl)：184-192.
［7］Uehara M, Takahashi J, Hirabayashi H, et al. Computer-assisted C1-C2 transarticular screw fixation“Magerl technique” for atlantoaxial instability. Asian Spine J， 2012， 6(3):168-177.
［8］Duan S, He H, Lv S, et al. Three-dimensional CT study on the anatomy of vertebral artery at atlantoaxial and intracranial segment. Surg Radiol Anat, 2010, 32(1)：39-44.
［9］Paramore CG, Dickman CA, Sonntag VK. The anatomical suitability of the C1-2 complex for transarticular screw fixation. J Neurosurg, 1996, 85(2)：221-224.
［10］Xu H, Chi YL, Wang XY, et al. Comparison of the anatomic risk for vertebral artery injury associated with percutaneous atlantoaxial anterior and posterior transarticular screws. Spine J, 2012, 12(8):656-662.
［11］Marcotte P, Dickman CA, Sonntag VK, et al. Posterior atlantoaxial facet screw fixation. J Neurosurg， 1993， 79(2):234-237.
［12］Ferrari V， Parchi P， Condino S， et al. An optimal design for patient-specific templates for pedicle spine screws placement. Int J Med Robot， 2013， 9（3）：298-304.
［13］Lu S, Zhang YZ, Wang Z, et al. Accuracy and efficacy of thoracic pedicle screws in scoliosis with patient-specific drill template. Med Biol Eng Comput, 2012, 50(7)：751-758.
［14］Lu S, Xu YQ, Zhang YZ, et al. A novel computer-assisted drill guide template for lumbar pedicle screw placement: a cadaveric and clinical study. Int J Med Robot, 2009, 5(2)：184-191.
［15］Van Cleynenbreugel J, Schutyser F, Goffin J, et al. Image-based planning and validation of C1-C2 transarticular screw fixation using personalized drill guides. Comput Aided Surg, 2002, 7(1)：41-48.
［16］Kawaguchi Y, Nakano M, Yasuda T, et al. Development of a new technique for pedicle screw and magerl screw insertion using a 3-dimensional image guide. Spine, 2012, 37(23)：1983-1988.
［17］Goffin J, Van Brussel K, Martens K, et al. Three-dimensional computed tomography-based, personalized drill guide for posterior cervical stabilization at C1-C2. Spine, 2001, 26(12)：1343-1347.
