Abstract：Objective To compare curative effect of tibiofibular fractures treated by external fixation device and interlocking intramedullary nail. Methods A total of 121 patients with tibiofibular fractures were included in the study and were divided into external fixator group (56 patients) and interlocking intramedullary nail group (65 patients), according to diverse surgical approaches. The two groups were compared in indices of postoperative goodexcellent rate, intraoperative blood loss, operation time, subsided time of postoperative swelling, hospital stay, fracture healing time, time of fixation removal and incidence of postoperative complications.Results The postoperative excellence rate in external fixator group and interlocking intramedullary nail group was 88% and 89%, respectively (P>0.05). Compared with interlocking intramedullary nail group, the intraoperative blood loss was reduced more in external fixator group, with more evidently shortened operation time, subsided time of postoperative swelling and hospital stay (P<0.01). Fracture healing time and time of fixation removal, however, were significantly shorter in the interlocking intramedullary nail group than those in the external fixator group (P<0.01). Incidence of postoperative complications was 11% in the external fixator group and 28% in the interlocking intramedullary nail group (P<0.05). Conclusions External fixation device and interlocking intramedullary nail are both effective in treatment of tibial and fibular fractures. External fixation device with less damage to tissue is relatively more helpful to postoperative recovery. On the contrary, the interlocking intramedullary nail is relatively more conducive to fracture healing.
JIN Fen-qin,XUE Feng,XU Xue-rong.. Comparative study of external fixation device and interlocking intramedullary nail in treatment of tibiofibular fractures[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF TRAUMA, 2013, 29(1): 53-56.
［1］Krishan A, Peshin C, Singh D. Intramedullary nailing and plate osteosynthesis for fractures of the distal metaphyseal tibia and fibula. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong), 2009, 17(3):317-320.
［2］姚平. 胫腓骨骨折固定研究进展. 中国中医骨伤科杂志, 2007, 15（1）:69-71.
［3］Femino J E, Vaseenon T. The direct lateral approach to the distal tibia and fibula: a single incision technique for distal tibial and pilon fractures. Iowa Orthop J, 2009, 29:143-148.
［4］Morin PM, Reindl R, Harvey EJ, et al. Fibular fixation as an adjuvant to tibial intramedullary nailing in the treatment of combined distal third tibia and fibula fractures: a biomechanical investigation. Can J Surg, 2008, 51（1）:45-50.
［5］Riel RU, Gladden PB. A simple method for fashioning an antibiotic cement-coated interlocking intramedullary nail. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ), 2010, 39（1）:18-21.
［11］Demiralp B, Atesalp AS, Bozkurt M, et al. Spiral and oblique fractures of distal one-third of tibia-fibula: treatment results with circular external fixator. Ann Acad Med Singapore, 2007, 36(4):267-271.
